Most Popular Stories
- Leading health plan CEO paychecks
- 15 Free Healthcare Apps for the iPhone
- Aetna is best health plan, UnitedHealthcare is worst, hospital execs say
- Nurses' jobs at risk for allegedly posting patient info on Facebook
- UnitedHealthcare contracts stop making no-warning fee changes
- WI nurses fired over cell photos of X-ray
Featured Jobs
-
Director of Sales for Fast Growing CA Start-up
BAM Labs, Inc. - San Jose, CA -
Pharmacist opening
CompHealth - Metropolitan area, IA
Featured Jobs from Healthcare IT Central
Events
- Transform 2010: Thinking Differently About Health Care
September 12 - 14 — Minnesota - 2nd Annual Mobile Healthcare Industry Summit
September 21 - 22 — Radisson Blu, London - Health Care Business Alliance (HCBA) 2010
October 1 — Nashville, TN - National Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Congress - October 25 - 27
Paid Research Reports
- Electronic health records: getting it right first time
- Cloud Computing Adoption In The APAC Life Sciences Industry
- Stakeholder Opinions: Ophthalmology - Leading brands under threat
- Genomics, Proteomics and Metabolomics in Diagnostics: Market landscape, innovative technologies and future outlook
- Healthcare Regulatory Update: The United Arab Emirates
- Point of Care Testing: Evaluating the return to evidence based medicine, novel technologies and the competitive landscape
Be sure to checkout FierceEMR for Meaningful Use updates!
Latest News
Free Newsletter
FierceHealthIT is the leading source of Healthcare IT news with a special focus on CPOE, EMR adoption, HIPAA compliance and other critical areas. Join 30,000+ healthcare industry insiders who get FierceHealthIT via weekly email for their must know IT news. Sign up today!
About | View Sample | Privacy
Top Tags
Headlines from HIStalk News
Whitepapers
- Member Correspondence: 8 Things You Need to Know
- Disaster Preparedness: Wireless Communication in Hospital Disaster Preparedness and Recovery
- Improving Heart Failure Outcomes through Interactive Patient Care: The Sentara Virginia Beach General Hospital Experience
- Out of Network Rate Setting in the Post-Ingenix Environment
- Making the Right Long-Term Prescription for Medical Equipment Financing
- Healthcare Megatrends: The Future of Healthcare Financing and Delivery
We never sell or give away your contact information. Our reader's trust comes first.
Switch to ICD-10 should be very costly
Health IT administrators are far from done in their struggles to implement the new National Provider Identifier number, which has proved to be every bit as troublesome as the industry predicted. But apparently, HHS was determined to raise the angst level further. With its recent announcement that it was pushing for an October 2011 deadline for the industry to switch from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10 codes, health organizations are bracing themselves for millions in additional IT and operational expenses.
ICD-9-CM codes, which are used for electronic claims processing, remittance, advice, eligibility inquiries, referral authorizations and more, have been in place for 30 years, but most other developed nations around the world use ICD-10 codes. The new code set will allow clinical IT systems to record far more specific and rich diagnostic information than ICD-9 codes, as it contains more than 155,000 codes, while ICD-9 contains only 17,000.
However, as readers can well imagine, such a switch will prove to be immensely complex, not to mention quite costly. While estimates vary from one consulting firm to another, HHS estimates the cost of the switch at $1.64 billion industry-wide, including $356 million in training costs, lost productivity costs of $572 million and system change costs of $713 million. Meanwhile, HHS has estimated that health IT vendors should take on $55 million to $137 million in initial costs as they adopt their products to the new requirements.
Then, there's the reimbursement nightmares to come. HHS admits that the switch--like the NPI cutover--could initially cause significant cash flow problems for providers because of the increased risk of payment hold-ups due to coding and systems problems. HHS is predicting that claims-error rates will rise between 6 and 10 percent of all claims at the ICD-10 implementation date, up from a normal 3 percent rate typically seen for annual updates of ICD-9. Ugh--stock up on Excedrin, folks.
To learn more about the HHS proposal:
- read this Modern Healthcare piece (reg. req.)
Related Articles:
HHS proposes 2011 deadline for ICD-10 code adoption
CMS now says NPI must match IRS data
Related Stories
- SPOTLIGHT ON: Sebelius encouraged by direction of health IT
- Meaningful use is like 'fire, ready, aim" in absence of HHS guidance
- SPOTLIGHT: 'Breach notification' rule is inadequate to protect data, security pro says
- HHS taking comments on planned National Health Security Strategy
- OCR now publicly identifying practices reporting some HIPAA breaches
- Criticisms of final 'meaningful use' rule start to emerge
- Privacy, security 'tiger team' split on when patients must consent for HIE
- Massachusetts hospital may have lost backup files affecting 800,000 people
- HHS quietly withdraws HIPAA breach-notification rule
- HHS seeks feedback on planned comparative-effectiveness database
Comments
Post new comment
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site Map | List in Marketplace | Supplier in MarketplaceTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceComplianceIT | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceMobileHealthcare | FierceHealthPayer | FiercePracticeManagement | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceGovernmentIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBiotech Research | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceBiotechIT | FiercePharma Manufacturing | FierceMedicalDevices | FierceDrugDelivery | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe | FierceCable© 2010 FierceMarkets. All rights reserved. |
![]() |
