FierceHealthcareFierceHealthITFierceHealthFinanceHospital Impact   FierceCIOFierceMobileITFierceSarbox

Editor's Corner

Tools
Tags
doctors
HIMSS
pcp

 

So we're back to this, again--the issue of doctors not being good online citizens. At this point, I think consumers may be getting a bit annoyed. Yet another piece has appeared in a consumer publication expressing surprise that doctors don't spend more time on the Internet or on email communicating with them. 

If you can order from Domino's online, why not set up an appointment with your PCP or get a test result, much less exchange a few simple email messages, they wonder. And from a purely technical standpoint, they're right, of course--physically speaking, setting these functions up wouldn't require reinventing the art of Web applications.

Heaven knows doctors would love to do anything they can to make their lives easier. And aside from the hours that would be involved in writing smart email messages, most of the other functions would actually save time. So does this mean it's urgent for doctors to move ahead here? I'd argue that the answer is "yes" if they want to be at all sophisticated. 

Right now, realistically, most doctors who get access to such applications will be part of a large system like Boston's Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, which just set up a proprietary portal enabling a lot of doctor-patient interaction. But few smaller practices have the resources to do that right. Luckily, there's a raft of applications that are gearing up to help them do just that--many of which will be premiering at the HIMSS show at the end of this month--which weren't on the market even a few months ago.

Some of these new applications (look for our pending Awards to tell you about some of them) will even make it easy for the small practices that make up the bulk of non-adapters technically.

I guess what I'm trying to say here is that when it comes to e-doctoring, it should be a very interesting period of change over the next few months. Keep your eyes peeled...and I will too. -Anne

P.S. Please note that next week we'll be publishing on Tuesday the 20th, rather than Monday the 19th, due to the President's Day holiday. Enjoy your long weekend, and we'll see you on the 20th.

Comments

http://www.healthdecisions.org/News/default.aspx?doc_id=125162

Why as a physician I won't do E-mail-TIME!
I already spend about 2-4 hours a day on paper work (no less when I used an electronic medical record). Lab, x-ray and outside records review take a lot of time! Several years ago I tried doing E-mail and found patients or their family members wanted regular dialogues!! It took way to much time. I would have to decrease the nummber of patients seen per day in order to devote time to respond to E-mails. That would further erode the already drastically eroded practice revenue (while expenses increase). No wonder so many female physicians are leaving practice. We see fewer patients to begin with. Adding E-mail might be the nail in the coffin.

.........because we don't get paid for it. That's why.

It's a shame that physicians largely can't get paid for e-mail medicine, because my instinct (as an extremely wired patient) is that there are times it would help provide accessible care to some folks who seldom have time to see a doctor. That being said, with McKesson pitching e-mail through its Relay Health division, and getting some payers to actually reimburse for e-mail visits, I think the other payers will soon come on board. Ultimately, when CMS pays for such visits--and I believe it will at some point--they'll suddenly go mainstream. :-)

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

What is 3 + 90?
To combat spam, please solve the math question above.